'Take politics out of courts'

QUINTON MTYALA | 23 November, 2012 00:11 President Jacob Zuma. File photo. Cape Town High Court judge Dennis Davis has sounded the alarm bell to his peers in the judiciary, saying the courts should not interfere in areas outside their competence. EMAILPRINT Ruling against a DA application to force parliament to schedule an urgent debate on a vote of no confidence on President Jacob Zuma, Davis warned that the courts were increasingly being politicised. However, Davis said DA parliamentary leader Lindiwe Mazibuko had every right to table her motion under the Constitution. The ANC had initially attempted to use its majority to stop the motion from being discussed, but backtracked on Wednesday, saying the debate should go ahead - but only when parliament re-opens in February. Last night, the DA said it would file an urgent appeal in the Constitutional Court. In his judgment yesterday, Davis strongly rebuked politicians for running to the courts whenever they had a serious disagreement, saying this could lead to the politicisation of the judiciary. "Courts do not run the country; courts are there to police the constitutional boundaries. "Courts can only tell parliament that it must work within the constitutional framework ... there's an intrusion of judges into areas that are not in their competence," Davis said. Mazibuko brought the application against National Assembly s peaker Max Sisulu on Tuesday. It sought to force Sisulu to allow the debate of a motion of no confidence against Zuma before parliament went into recess yesterday . This was after Sisulu, in his capacity as chairman of the National Assembly's programming committee, failed to schedule the DA's motion because political parties represented on the committee had failed to find consensus on it. Davis ruled that, though there was no measure of consensus in the committee that would allow the vote, the ANC could not use its majority to subvert the constitution, which also protected minority parties such as the DA. He said the fact that the programming committee did not have deadlock-breaking mechanism could not be resolved in court. Davis could not rule on whether Sisulu, who also chairs the committee, had used "residual powers" to trump a vote of no confidence, as alleged by Mazibuko. He found that the court could not dictate to parliament, a principle enshrined in the constitutional doctrine of the separation of powers. Last night, Mazibuko said the DA had decided to approach the Constitutional Court ''on the basis that ''Judge Davis upheld the constitutional right that a motion of no confidence be debated in a reasonable time frame and that the National Assembly's failure to do so has frustrated this right''. Mazibuko said the party would also ask that the Constitutional Court rule that the debate be held as a matter of urgency. ANC chief whip Mathole Motshekga, a co-respondent in the matter, welcomed Judge Davis's ruling. Motshekga - whose party once accused judges of being counter-revolutionary - said: "In his judgment, Judge Davis concurred with our view that, in the spirit of the principle of separation of powers, the judiciary cannot be expected to adjudicate on matters falling under the authority of parliament. "We are concerned with the growing tendency by some parties to abuse the judiciary [by calling on] courts . to resolve the inter-party disagreements that should be resolved within parliament. It is irrational to expect courts to micro-manage parliament.'' Sisulu's office also lauded Davis's judgment, saying parliament was already reviewing the rules governing the business of the programming committee. "As the court indicated some weakness in our rules, we welcome the guidance provided in the judgment. One of these is the absence of provisions for a deadlock-breaking mechanism in the programme committee. Another is the notion of reaching decisions by consensus. ''The court, however, highlighted that voting on whether or not issues such as the motion of no confidence be introduced for debate in the National Assembly was not the answer.'' In a joint statement, the opposition sought to underplay the court defeat by pointing out that Davis's ruling had underscored shortcomings in the rules of the National Assembly. Constitutional law expert Paul Hoffman disagreed with Davis's judgment, saying the rules of parliament were inconsistent with the constitution and needed to be revised. Times Live Malema turns tables on ANC leadership AMUKELANI CHAUKE and CHANDRÉ PRINCE | 17 November, 2011 00:36 Julius Malema. File photo. Image by: LEBOHANG MASHILOANE Julius Malema believes he has punched holes in the ANC's disciplinary case against him and has vowed to fight to the bitter end. EMAILPRINT RELATED NEWS League's doubt over committee 'unfortunate': ANC ANC 'was out to discredit ANCYL leaders': Malema Suspensions were a formality: Malema He challenged the ANC to fire him because, he said, he had no intention of resigning. Last week the ANC's national disciplinary committee found Malema and his top executives guilty of contravening the party's constitution. Malema's membership of the party was suspended for five years and his top executives got suspended sentences pending their appeal. Yesterday, Malema and his executives turned the tables and accused senior ANC leaders of using the national disciplinary committee as a platform "to settle political scores", for "personal problems" and "to stifle debate". They questioned the legitimacy of the hearings. ANC secretary-general Gwede Mantashe and disciplinary committee chairman Derek Hanekom were singled out. Mantashe was accused of masterminding the charges against the youth league leadership; Hanekom of pursuing a political agenda. "A decision to convict and sanction the ANC Youth League leadership was taken by the secretary-general, who made his intentions clear in all his statements." Malema said that during the disciplinary hearings Hanekom had failed to control his temper. He said the committee was convened "merely" to give his conviction legitimacy. But the ANC yesterday rejected the claims and said issues raised by the youth league should be taken to its appeals committee. Malema's accusations were made as the ANC leadership race is hotting up. Youth League structures are pushing behind the scenes for Zuma to be replaced by his deputy, Kgalema Motlanthe, and for their former president, Fikile Mbalula, to replace Mantashe as secretary-general next year. In their defence yesterday, Malema and his executives said the ANC's national officials, led by Zuma, were not empowered by the party's constitution to institute disciplinary charges against them, and that they should have allowed the party's national executive committee to prefer the charges. But the ANC yesterday said its constitution fully empowered its national officials to prefer charges against any member. Malema said Hanekom had used an outdated youth league constitution to effect his removal from office. He said a new constitution, which was amended at the youth league's national conference, in June, gives his national executive committee the right to subject a ruling party conviction to a youth league inquiry. But senior ANC leaders who spoke to The Times rejected Malema's stance. They said the constitutions of ANC organisations could not conflict with the constitution of the parent body. "If we use [Malema's] logic it will mean that a magistrate's court can overrule the Constitutional Court. It cannot be like that. That amendment they made is invalid," said a senior party official last night. Malema said that, despite his conviction, he will not give up the helm of the youth league. He said the ANC did not have the power to suspend him and he would appeal. Malema questioned the composition of the national disciplinary committee, and accused Collins Chabane, Susan Shabangu and Hanekom of conflict of interest. He said they had expressed views against the youth league's campaigns for the nationalisation of mines and land expropriation. Malema said Chabane refused to recuse himself from the committee despite having done so in respect of last year's disciplinary hearing. He said that the factors that prompted Chabane to recuse himself last year could not have changed. "Hanekom is recorded as having publicly said that one of the policy positions of the ANC Youth League on expropriation of land without compensation will not happen as long as he is in the ANC," Malema said. He warned that if ANC leaders were allowed to use the party's constitution to solve personal problems, then the party would be in danger of disintegrating. Last night, the youth league said the possibility that Hanekom, Shabangu and Chabane used the national disciplinary committee to settle political scores and suppress dissent was very high. As the battle between the ANC and its youth wing continues, ANC Gauteng chairman and Arts and Culture Minister Paul Mashatile yesterday conceded that the ruling party had "enormous" challenges. Mashatile threw down the gauntlet, saying that the ANC was "going through a lot of challenges", and intimating that the organisation was at a crossroads. Referring to the youth league's war with the ANC's leaders, Mashatile said Albert Luthuli would not have allowed such "shenanigans". "He [Luthuli] would be the one going to young leaders to tell them to focus on the objectives of what the ANC set many years ago. "There are a lot of new people in the organisation that still need to be taught the ways of the ANC," said Mashatile. He warned that it was imperative that the ANC re-focus its energy on unity ahead of next year's centenary celebrations in January and the elective conference in Mangaung in December. Malema said that, despite the verdicts against him, he would not give up his leadership of the youth league, and said the ANC had no power to suspend him. He said he would appeal his suspension. "Resigning is not an option. I must be fired. It is not only me [who was charged] it was the entire leadership," he said. Malema said his resignation would set a precedent for those who succeeded him, forcing them to resign if they were accused of making radical statements. "So, to save many generations, we have to soldier on in defence of the autonomy of the youth league and its leadership. "We are a radical and militant voice. It has not started with us, it started with the founding generation in 1944. When you want to destroy this youth league because you are irritated by Malema, then you are wrong. You are destroying the legacy of Nelson Mandela and OR Tambo. "Why didn't Madiba resign even when he was in a difficult situation like that . 27 years in prison, five years of loitering in the streets. Why must I resign? "We are fighting a political battle, not a personal battle. Let the enemies celebrate; their celebration will be short-lived. You will never destroy the radical politics of the ANC." TIMES LIVE - - - - - - COMMENTS BY SONNY FIRSTLY ; "TAKE CORRUPTION OUT OF POLITICS!" Then, consider taking politics out of court. KEEP CRIMINALS LOCKED UP WITHOUT BAIL OR RECOURSE TO THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IF THEY WERE POLITICIANS!! Oh, One more thing - Get rid of Politically appointed judges and Ministers..... Long live the ANCYL, LONG LIVE......VIVA!