Monday, June 24, 2013

Jeppestown Massacre 25 th June 2006 ..... Ambushed ..Protect And Serve - Not Die

25 June 2006 – The Jeppestown Massacre, Jeppestown, central Johannesburg. After a robbery, 23 robbers were followed by a police helicopter to a safe house. 4 SAPS members were ambushed and murdered. 8 robbers were killed in the siege before the remaining 15 gang members surrendered. Members of the Special Task Force were deployed to assist the SAPS in ending the siege.


Protect And Serve - Not Die

My four brave buddies in BLUE
Today the Country salutes you
You were all an inspirational light
Keeping your mission and zest bright
Little did you ever know
What seeds of evil against you could sow

On Sunday 25th June 2006 you were on duty
Little knowing what was expected of you
To come up against the trained forced of evil
Lead to your fate by Lucifer, the Devil
You were outnumbered, outgunned and slain
Like pigs going to their slaughter

Out numbered, not once, out spirited
You stood your ground like heroes
You carried your cross like disciples
You paid the supreme price with your flesh
You have all earned a place in heaven
While your enemy will languish in HELL!

Copyright (c)2006 William Ernest Cox

The above poem says it all.
To many Policeman are being killed in the line of duty.
Lifelong jail sentence for any murder of a policeman is not good enough.
No mercy must be shown!

March 9, 2008 1:28 AM

Fourteen policeman alone were killed during the month of June 2006 in the line of duty. Four of them were the four buddies in blue killed during a shootout with at least twenty heavily armed robbers in Jeppestown .

Chilling glimpse into 'Jeppestown Massacre'
January 31 2008 at 07:36am

By Alex Eliseev

For 19 months, photographs of the Jeppestown bloodbath lay hidden in police dockets and court files - but today it's clear why the June 25 2006 shootout was dubbed a massacre.

Some of the 1 000-odd images presented to the Johannesburg High Court on Wednesday are too grisly to publish, but they tell the real and frightening story of a raid gone very wrong.

The most striking photograph shows two slain police officers - Constable Pieter Seaward and Inspector Gert Schoeman - on the floor in a final embrace.

Seaward's right hand is resting on his colleague's arm, his left hand is tucked under Schoeman, only the hand protruding.

Their blue uniforms are covered in blood and dust from the crumbling plaster.

All around is the bloody chaos of a standoff that, in the end, claimed 12 lives.

The wall above the officers is smeared in streaks of blood and riddled with bullet holes. At their feet is a bag used by the gang to carry their loot.

The floor is a wild mess of clothes, suitcases, bags, takkies, newspapers, car tools, buckets and coins.

In the same room lie three dead robbers - one at the feet of the dead cops, one on the floor and one on his back on the bed. Five guns are scattered around the bedroom.

The photo albums also contain pictures from the postmortems, detailed ballistic diaries, chilling glimpses inside other rooms at 54 Mordaunt Street, the areas surrounding the house, and money bags stolen from the Honeydew Pick n Pay and recovered in the hideout.

The much-awaited trial of the "Jeppestown Massacre 13" began on Wednesday after a two-day delay.

State prosecutor Joanie Spies read out the 23 charges and was met with defiant pleas of "I'm not guilty" on all counts from all accused.

This means the trial - set down until the end of March - is likely to run its full course.

The 12 men and one woman face various charges of robbery, murder, attempted murder, and being in possession of unlicensed and illegal firearms.

All but one accused exercised their right to remain silent. Zinto Mqunu claimed he had gone to the house to visit a sangoma and was not involved in the robbery.

Ballistic evidence has shown that at least 27 firearms were used in the siege - including an AK-47 - and that more than 110 shots were fired by the seized weapons.

The real figure - including shots fired by police outside the house - is closer to 300.

On Wednesday, 11 handguns and an AK-47 were laid out as evidence. The service pistols of Schoeman, Seaward, and inspectors Victor Mathye and Frikkie van Heerden were also presented.

Two witnesses were called to give evidence: a woman robbed outside the Pick n Pay and a supervisor on duty on that bloody Sunday.

Joanne Brown, who has an artificial leg, had parked in the disabled-parking spot outside the supermarket. As she opened the door, "a chap" appeared and ordered her to hand over her handbag.

She later saw a man with the bag - covered in "trinkets, teddy bears and silly things" - making a getaway. She spotted a red Honda Ballade and claimed it was used by the gang. The car was then linked to the scene in Jeppestown.

Sarah Marumole - a supervisor at the Pick n Pay since 2002 - was six months pregnant when the gang struck.

She said she worked with one of the accused, Mary Maleke, who is thought to be the insider at the store.

Marumole attended an identity parade at C-Max prison (where 10 of the accused are kept) but said she was too scared to point out anyone.

On Wednesday, she was given a set of photographs and picked out one of the faces.

None of the widows of the slain police officers were in court.


Widow relives horror of Jeppestown massacre
KHETHIWE MABENA | 01 September, 2009 17:56

CHEATED: Widows Leonie van Heerden and Nadia Seaward listen to proceedings in the Johannesburg High Court yesterday. Van Heerden earlier recounted events that led to her husband being killed .Pic: ALON SKUY. 04/11/2008. © The Times.
THE widow of a policeman murdered in the Jeppestown massacre wept as she described how difficult it was for her to explain their father's death to her young children.

"Every day of their lives [my children] miss their father. We do not go to bed without my son asking why they shot his dad," said Inspector Leonie van Heerden in the Johannesburg High Court yesterday.

"I am angry. They took away the best thing in my life."

The widow, also a police officer, has spent many days in court listening to the proceedings.

"We had dreams, things we wanted to go through together. I'm missing my best friend's company, his jokes, everything," she said.

Her husband and partner in the Roodepoort police dog unit, Inspector Frederick "Frikkie" van Heerden, was one of the four police-men killed during the bloody Jeppestown shootout in June 2006.

She, too, was at the scene, but survived.

The police officers had driven to Jeppestown after a tip-off that an 18-man gang was hiding in a house in the area.

Eight robbers died during the five-hour gun battle with the police.

Van Heerden was one of the four witnesses called by the state to testify in aggravation of sentence against the 12 accused who were recently convicted for charges including murder, attempted murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, and illegal possession of firearms and ammunition.

She had previously said that she would not be able to testify against her husband's killers because she was still traumatised and was undergoing counselling.

Yesterday, however, she was the first of the witnesses to testify.

"I remember that Inspector Victor Mathye was shot in both legs and was down on the kitchen floor. I remember that he fired shots to keep the people inside the house at bay and that he was using his last breath to fire the shots," she said.

"I was bleeding from the head and a person came out of the house, looked at me, laughed and ran off."

Van Heerden lost her composure when she was asked to describe how the incident affected their daughter: "Her father was everything to her," she said.

ý Accused Emmanuel Mweli, 29, appealed for leniency because he had "already spent two years behind bars" and was "still young".

Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng dismissed an application that it be recorded that three of the accused felt that he had pre-judged them and had not properly considered their evidence.


Life sentences for Jeppestown massacre accused
Submitted by MyHoneydew on Fri, 28/11/2008 - 07:52.
28 November 2008

Eleven of the 13 accused in the Jeppestown massacre were on Thursday given four life sentences each by the Johannesburg High Court for the murders of four policemen.

Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng also gave them 40 years each for other crimes relating to the incident, including the killing of eight others who were thought to be members of the gang.

As sentence was past, family members of the slain policemen wept and hugged each other before leaving the court room.

Fanie Schoeman, brother of slain police Sergeant Gert Schoeman, said "I'm happy that it's over, but we can't say that justice has been served, because they took my brother away.

"The message that the judge gave to other criminals is a good one... Police are there to protect us, it doesn't matter what background you come from, you should know what is right and what is wrong," he said
with tears in his eyes.

Those sentenced to life were Nkosinathi Mzamo Mchunu, of Hillbrow; Sizwe Mbuyazi, of Joubert Park; Khumbulani Mabaso, of Johannesburg CBD; Sizwe Dlamini, of Fairview; Sihle Mdunge, of Hillbrow; Muzulelwa Vezi, of Johannesburg's Bree Street; Siyanda Mgomezulu, of Hillbrow; Hlongwa, of Jabulani Hostel; Bekokwakhe Zulu, of Benrose Hostel; Mhlomme Sesiba, of O'Riley Street, Johannesburg and Zinto Mqunu of Jeppestown.

Most of the accused were fathers of very young children.

The "prime mover" behind the Pick 'n Pay robbery in Honeydew which eventually led to the bloody shoot-out in Jeppestown two years ago, Senzo Mweli, 29, was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. He was also sentenced to five years for attempted murder, which would run concurrently with the 20-year sentence.

The policemen were killed in the shoot-out at a house in Mordaunt Street, Jeppestown, on Sunday June 25, 2006 in the aftermath of the

Inspectors Frederick "Frikkie" van Heerden, 32, and Victor Nzama Mathye, 49, both of the West Rand dog unit; Sergeant Gert Schoeman, 30, of the West Rand emergency response service; and Constable Pieter
Seaward, 31, of the Johannesburg dog unit died in the gunfight.

The father of Schoeman said earlier that he looked forward to closing a painful chapter of his life.

"I have waited two-and-a-half years for this book to be closed. It's been two-and-a-half years without any proper sleep. My son was a very brave man and I am very proud of him," said Stanley Schoeman.

Provincial Commissioner for Gauteng, Director Govindsamy Marimuthoo,
said the sentencing was settling for all members in the police force.

"We welcome the sentencing, and will continue in the fight against crime...our fallen heroes have paid the ultimate is a great relief to know that those responsible for these atrocious acts have received justice."

Mokgoatlheng said that the background the accused came from should not be an excuse to the events that occurred.

"People cant be allowed to take the law into their own hands, because we have the capacity to think what is right and what is wrong...what this court can't understand is why people should kill in cold blood."

He said that while he understood that the financial situation of the accused was very dire, it was no excuse even if all eleven of the 12 accused were all first time offenders.

"We come from a very painful past, but I try to understand why such a waste of life happens for money...speaking as a black judge, I must say, that in South Africa today, a black man can rise and become what he wants to be."

He said that South African policemen were the bastion of the constitution and society would not accept the killing of a policeman while on duty.

"No civilised society should live like this...people should be allowed to go shopping on a Sunday morning without the fear of being shot and killed."

Promise Mchunu, brother of accused number 3, Nkosinathi Mzamo Mchunu, appeared depressed ahead of the sentencing.

"My brother is not okay. I spoke to him three days ago. He is very sad. I am very sad about this situation too, I love him very much," said Mchunu.

In response to Mchunu's testimony that police had shot at the robbers first, Mokgoatlheng said that the police were just doing their job.

"The police were following you criminals, it is not correct that the police shot at you first, they were just doing their work, and they should be allowed to do their work," he said.


The facts as sent in by Anonymous; CATO MANOR

Background to the SVCU - Cato Manor

by Durban Organised Crime Unit - KZN on Monday, 26 March 2012 at 07:23 •

For those of you who are just joining this group, here is some background to bring you up to speed.

There is currently a fraud trial about to commence in which a Durban businessman (Mr. Thoshan Panday) and a police colonel (Mr. Navin Madhoe) were arrested on allegations that they ran a police accommodation scam during the World Cup Soccer which defrauded tax payer 60 million rand.

Shortly after their arrest, these individuals are alleged to have attempted to bribe, the DBN Organised Crime Commander, General Johan Booysen to side line the investigation.

Booysen declined the offer and as a result, Colonel Madhoe was also arrested for corruption. At some stage, crime scene photo graphs were stolen from a computer from the offices of the Serious Violent Crimes Section (SVC) of the DBN Organised Crime Unit.
This was one of Booysen’s departments which ultimately fell under his command. These photos were also used in an attempt to persuade Booysen to drop the fraud charges.

The reason being, some of these photos could have been seen out of context as some of the SVC staff was pictured allegedly drinking alcohol (even though they were off duty). The remainder of the photos were of dead bodies, either from gun skirmishes with police or of victims of crime killed during hijackings, robberies etc.

The threat was to release the photo’s to the press alleging that the unit was acting like a hit squad and then celebrating afterwards with booze filled parties. The hope here was that all these investigators would be either fired or arrested thus making it impossible for them to testify in the pending fraud case as some of the police witnesses against both these men, came from this unit.
Neither General Booysen, nor his investigation team heeded to this threat, and the investigation continued.Suddenly, on the morning of 11th December 2011,

The Sunday Times flooded our door steps and newsstands with an “amazing expose” on how they had uncovered a police “hit squad”. They further claimed that they had been hard at work on this story for the past 3 years.

They claimed that the SVC Unit based at Cato Manor was actually a hit squad taking revenge on police murders and that they had photos to prove this. Quite a coincidence as this had just been the threat made by the “little extortionist” just a few weeks earlier. The photos were hard hitting.
Unless one was use to seeing violent and grotesque photo’s of dead bodies, the news was certainly sensational. The newspaper even claimed that the unit acted like a Vlakplaas unit.

Not a very nice allegation to make against anyone. What the Times failed to report was that SVC had won numerous awards for their high detection and conviction rate. That, in the same period of time, two of its own members had been shot and killed on duty.

Thus making it quite likely that they would be involved in that many shootings. There was no comparison offered against stats as to how many policemen died in the country over that same period of time.
If they publicised this one would understand that amount of deaths, yet regrettable, were understandable.Then, when two of the unit’s detectives agreed to meet with these journalists to set the record straight, the journalist’s again wrote with a crooked pen, stretching the truth describing the meeting as a sordid event.

They even wrongly accused a policeman in the media as a shooter in shooting incidents, even after a heads up was given them at this meeting, that they had their facts wrong.

One can only assume that Sunday Times enjoys paying out lawsuits or that there is something more sinister at play here. Perhaps the integrity of these journalist’s needs to be questioned.

It seems that whenever they publicise the name’s of any detective from this unit, it just coincidently happens to be a detective who is a witness against the pair charged for fraud.After the breaking news, the excrement hit the fan in HQ and two investigation teams were assembled and sent to Durban from Pretoria (Hawks Head office) and Limpopo (ICD) to investigate these allegations. The SVC detectives had all their cell phones, computer’s, cameras and firearms seized for forensic analysis.

Confidential informer files were perused and informers were traced and contacted. The entire SVC staff compliment was treated as suspects regardless of any specific case number or shooting incident. The unit was closed with immediate effect.

The amount of effort and logistics put into it was quite sensational, much like the newspaper article, however when SVC members asked for legal assistance of choice (like a previous disgraced National Commissioner was afforded), they were simply told, NO! Shame on you police management.

You plan to leave your boys out in the cold like that. How about growing some back bone and integrity.Both these internal investigation teams still continue with their “amazing” work in Durban at great expense to the tax payer and with little indication as to their end date.

Perhaps the investigators from up country are enjoying a little sun and sea in Durban. One certainly hopes that their accommodation was not arranged by either Panday or Madhoe.

The Times also published photos of shootings that this unit was not even involved in. One would think, that at a time when the controversial “Info Bill” hangs in the air, that any journalist worth their salt would for first question the motive of their source.

It is what junior investigators taught on Detective Course in the subject of informer handling. Always question the motive of your informer. The reason for this is to prevent you from being used as a pillar of Organised Crime by simply removing opposition. Then, perhaps these journalists were duped? However, surely if one really investigated the allegations for three years, one would have clarified certain issues prior to going to press and publically humiliating career detectives who have served their country. Or was that also a lie?

These are the questions you must ask yourself.The Times writes as if they have had privy to confidential shooting reports and affidavits held by the Independent Complaints Department. I seriously hope not. That would be another law suit waiting to happen. The photographs, one could argue, are stolen police property. But that aside, what was reassuring was that several “real” journalist’s had come forward to place on record that they too were offered these photographs at some point but did not wish to run with the story as certain date stamps on picture folders were altered thus questioning their authenticity.

Perhaps the reporters at the Times thought they had found the story of a lifetime and went with it with little consideration to those they may hurt along the way. Perhaps, it was the fact that they had found witnesses, or perhaps it was their overseas financed ballistics expert, who knows. Let us leave that to the courts.

I too was once a detective who interviewed many witnesses, story tellers, money seeker’s, revenge seekers. Their worth gets examined at a court of law, not a newspaper. So, in a nut shell that is what’s going on. They have labelled our “good guys” as “hit men” and claimed that they “executed 51”.

That is a serious accusation after so many of their facts already published were wrong. They claim they have booze filled celebrations after near death experiences.

If so, perhaps the post battle drink was how they dealt with it all. The law states that the burden of proof rests with the accuser so let’s wait for what the courts decide. Put simple: “He who accuses, must prove”. Until then, these media men have successfully disbanded one of our greatest tools against violent criminals in KZN. Our blanket of protection is gone.

This is not only a concern for the public but for the other police officers who perform their daily duties as this unit also had the task of solving and preventing the murders of police officers.Mark my words; take a look at the stats in year’s time. Violent crime will escalate and many innocents will die unnecessarily at the hands of criminals.

“Their successes weren’t reached by keeping office hours and scheduled lunch breaks. It was reached by putting in the effort, working beyond the call of duty and by just being great detectives.”Another thing I was taught in Detective school was that most things in life happen for a reason and that I should question everything that happens.

One thing that bothers me here is why are the police turning on their own all of a sudden, why do they visit the families of those shot by police even when they know these individuals had a criminal past. There is seriously something bigger at play here.

It is for these reasons that this page exists. We have to support our guys; we cannot afford to lose 10, 20 or 30 seasoned detectives because of some fraudster’s dirty tricks. There is far more at stake here. I speak for myself here, but my detective nose is twitching and I am of the opinion that Panday holds black mail over someone’s head high up on the government ladder and that is why all the pressure is on to dissolve yet another good investigation unit.

Stand firm folks and believe, lady justice holds a mighty big sword.



Sonny CoxJune 26, 2012 at 4:08 AM


TangoJune 26, 2012 at 9:18 AM
Salute ! RIP Buddies in Blue !



    They will be hunted down and shown no mercy!


  2. They are remembered. R.I.P

  3. We honour your Memory! We will never forget! Salute and RIP

  4. We honour your Memory! We will never forget! Salute and RIP