Tuesday, February 5, 2013

News National The ANC and FNB's ads: Storm in a teacup

No Fear No Favour - The Truth is Supreme........
























04 FEB 2013 20:56 - FARANAAZ PARKER


Analysts say the ruckus over the ANC's response to FNB's "You Can Help" campaign has been overblown and the adverts themselves were miscalculated.




"FNB made a political statement so we shouldn't be surprised that the ANC responded in kind. Frankly I'm surprised that people are surprised," said political analyst Ebrahim Fakier on Monday.
Fakier was commenting on the uproar over the incident in which videos that formed part of FNB's "You Can Help" campaign were removed following criticism from the ANC.
In the videos one of the teens says: "Stop voting for the same government in hopes for change – instead, change your hopes to a government that has the same hopes as us," while another says: "South African people need to wake up – 1994 is gone! It is gone!"
FNB's chief marketing officer Bernice Samuels said it was not the bank's intention to attack the government or the ANC but to "call on every South African, in a practical and meaningful way, to play their part in helping to create a better South Africa".
The bank later met with the party to discuss the incident and apologised for the campaign and there was a subsequent backlash over its decision to back down from it's original position.
Problematic response
But Fakier said it was FNB's response that was problematic.
"What FNB did, which is new, is that they engaged in a severe act of contrition. If you want to make a political statement, stand your ground. That they relented, for me, is the problem," he said.
Fakier pointed out that while the party was vocal in its criticism, there was no criticism from government.
"If a government acts adversely towards [criticism] I think we should all worry. But if a party responds vigorously, it's their right," he said.
The ANC's reaction to the FNB adverts was not out of character for a political party, he added.
At the same time, Fakir expressed concern about what appears to be a growing intolerance from government.
ANC fury
In recent years the ANC developed a reputation for coming down harshly on those who criticised it – last year the party organised a march on the Goodman Gallery which had on display a painting of President Jacob Zuma with his genitals exposed. It also criticised Nedbank's chairperson Reuel Khoza, who made critical comments on the country's leadership in the bank's annual report.
"If you look at everything from the Protection of State Information Bill and the Traditional Courts Bill right down to the DA's march to Cosatu, the day the DA wanted to go to Nkandla, the day the DA went to [Swayimane] where there have been quite a few rapes and they were intimidated by the local counsellors, when you put all these tings together, it looks like there's this creeping sense of intolerance from the ANC," he said.
Steven Friedman, director of the Centre for the Study for Democracy, agreed that the ANC was entitled to criticise the adverts.
"They got angry, they're entitled to get angry," he said, adding that it would not be acceptable in any country for a company to run an advert, under their logo, urging people you to vote against a particular party.
"There's an obvious reason for this," he said. "You're going to upset the governing party and their supporters and that's what FNB did.
Friedman said that what was lost in the conversation on the matter was the fact that the ANC did not, at any stage, threaten that FNB would lose its banking license or other business opportunities.
Nando's
"I'm not arguing that FNB has no right to do this. If FNB wants to do this, they can do it. All I'm saying is do not be surprised if people react negatively."
Friedman said the reason why companies like Nando's, which is known for its tongue-in-cheek social commentary – did not have similar responses was because its adverts were more subtle and humorous.
But Nando's itself did have some of its adverts canned due to criticism. TV spots dealing with famous dictators and xenophobia had their runs cut short.
Also, he said, "Nando's have never run an ad saying 'stop voting for the ANC, start voting for another party'. That's what the FNB advert said."
Friedman said that the ANC's reaction was "entirely predicable" and not indicative of bullying.
"We shouldn't worry," he said. "We should start to worry if they start threatening that something nasty will happen to you, that you won't get business or get a license. That's bullying."
Instead, he criticised the mainstream debate on the matter, saying national debate became less about a diversity of voices and more about ranting against government.
'Chilling effect'
"We really have reached a stage now where for most commentators, it's free speech to attack the ANC and bullying for the ANC to reply," he said.
Meanwhile, Spiwe Chireka, communications analyst at the International Data Corporation, said that while the bank was not censored as such, the incident might have a chilling effect on what types of campaigns advertising companies were willing to run.
"I wouldn't go as far as to say [FNB] was censored," said Chireka.
"The advert went out. It's already achieved its desired effect. People saw it, there was a discussion. Although it was no longer about the content of the ads, it achieved its desired effect. But other advertising houses will think very carefully about how they go about criticising government."
Independent communications strategist Sarah Britten agreed that the incident could discourage companies from pushing the envelope.
"It's very difficult to create a campaign about what is wrong with society. Now it's going to be even more difficult because every time a corporate stands up and talks about education or social issues, its going to be read in a particular way," she said.
Limits
​Britten said it was important to have a forum for debate on social issues but that she was unsure whether this could be achieved through an ad campaign.
"Advertising has its limits," she said.
Marketing analyst Chris Moerdyk described the campaign as a whole as "ill-advised" and took a cynical view of the bank's motivation for running with a risky campaign that broke a cardinal rule of advertising: stay well away from politics.
Moerdyk said he believed the decision to run with the campaign was rooted in the increasing difficulty advertisers faced in getting consumers' attention.
"It's become more and more difficult. The consumer's attention is being distracted by television, sport, radio and particularly by the online environment and social media," he said.
"This particularly applies to advertising. On television we've now got 50-something channels, we've got PVRs that allow us to skip advertising, and on radio and television, many consumers switch channels when an ad comes."
"There is a certain desperation to actually get attention and really I believe that's at the nub of this," he said.
Mail & Guardian




-

Public protector to probe R1.25bn Reddy tender



04 FEB 2013 14:18 - STAFF REPORTER




The DA has received confirmation from the public protector that it will investigate the smart meters contract awarded to Vivian Reddy.


This follows the Democratic Aliance (DA)'s request for an investigation submitted on January 18 2013. The public protector indicated that the investigation will be conducted by its good governance unit.
R1.25-billion contract to supply "smart" electricity meters to the City of Johannesburg was manipulated to favour Vivian Reddy, one of President Jacob Zuma's key benefactors, information obtained by the Mail & Guardian suggested.
DA questions
"There are a number of troubling questions with this tender that the public protector must resolve," the DA said. Questions include why the tender was inflated from R800-million to R1.25-billion after it was awarded to Edison, Vivian Reddy's corporation.
Questions were also raised as to why the original bid scores were changed to Edison's advantage and why the tender was awarded solely to Edison after the bid committee recommended it be awarded to multiple bidders.
The DA further questioned what role City Power's managing director Sicelo Xulu played in changing the bid scores.
"We believe that the process followed in awarding this tender was fundamentally flawed to advantage Mr Reddy's company. The public protector must now get to work to get to the bottom of this as soon as possible", said the DA.
M&G investigation
The City and its power utility, which procured the meters, have denied any irregularities in awarding the tender.
But key discrepancies uncovered by the M&G suggested otherwise.
These included:
  • Detailed allegations that an initial technical evaluation scoresheet was amended to improve the result for Reddy's company, Edison Power; 
  • The revised scoring pushed another bidder, Hefcom, below the cut-off 70% technical score. When price was factored in, Hefcom – whose bid was half the cost of Edison's – would have scored better than Edison; 
  • A letter informing Edison it had won the bid is dated before City Power supply chain management even received the bid recommendation or the chair of the adjudication committee had signed off on the decision; 
  • Edison's share of the contract was pushed up from an initial recommendation of a R600-million share of an R800-million contract to an exclusive contract for R1.25-billion; and 
  • A man central to the award, City Power chief executive Sicelo Xulu, is alleged to be "friends with Zuma" though he denies this.
Reddy's funding to Nkandla
The three-year contract to deliver hundreds of thousands of so-called smart meters was awarded in August 2012. 
The meters will allow the municipality to track and control electricity usage remotely at each metering point in real time. The project is also intended to cut down on fraud and tampering.
There are about 1.5-million metering points in the greater Johannesburg area, the majority of which have to be read manually.
Edison has no prior experience in smart metering, several industry sources said, but the company teamed up with established United States metering company Itron, which separately won the much smaller R50-million contract for the centralised data management "back end" of the system.
Edison was one of the businesses that paid to be at the ANC's Mangaung conference in December and Reddy has long been a vocal supporter of Zuma.
Reddy stepped in to fund part of Zuma's Nkandla homestead in 2003, when the president's former associate Schabir Shaik ran into difficulties.
He featured prominently in the report by auditors KPMG on Zuma's benefactors that was prepared for Zuma's abandoned corruption trial.
Reddy reportedly paid R450 000 for a table at the ANC's anniversary gala dinner in Durban in January, when Zuma made the controversial remark that "wise" businessmen who supported the ANC could expect that "everything you touch will multiply".
Edison replies
​Edison executive director Bazil Govender, responding on behalf of Edison and Reddy, hit out at suggestions that the firm had been favoured.
"We are fully aware of the company [that has] complained to the M&G, because they tried to pressurise us into partnering with them after the award of the contract," he said.
"They threatened to go to the press, to make an issue of this award. We rejected this approach because we believe it was highly unethical.
"We are lodging a formal complaint to City Power to fully investigate this serious breach of ethics."

-





-








-



-























-

He shrugged off Edison's relative inexperience with smart metering, saying that the company was working with an experienced partner in Itron: "We believe we offered the best solution to City Power."
Mail & Guardian








2 comments:


  1. COMMENTS BY SONNY
    -



    NOTHING MORE THAN ANC WINDOW DRESSING.
    LEARNERS AND STUDENTS ENJOY FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
    They (anc) want to divert the "Real Corruption and irregularities" aimed against them.
    Zuma and his party have a lot to be held ACCOUNTABLE for!
    We will not be disturbed by ANC Communist Propaganda!!
    WE SHALL OVERCOME!!
    THE PEOPLE SHALL RULE SOUTH AFRICA AGAIN!
    We also had a DREAM!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Loan Express Limited is a registered and authorized loan company, they offer loans to all blacklisted citizen, no credit check, same day approval and instant pay out. they are interested in your financial well-being.
    Qualification:
    1. Blacklisted can apply
    2. No credit check
    3. Debt review or court order can apply
    4. ITC can apply
    5. Low credit score can apply.
    Home Loans up to R2M
    Personal Loans of Up to R450 000
    plus Debt Consolidation Loans of Up to R1,000,000
    Business Loans of Up to R10M
    Payday Loan up to R80 000
    Interested Applicant should reply to this advert by emailing them at: [ infoexpresslmited@gmail.com ] and you will be surprise the way they will attend to you within 5 minute.
    Good,, Bye to Debt & Poverty. This is Quick cash that help me, they can help you too!!! I was blacklisted,, so they can help you too

    ReplyDelete